How to Apply the ICH E Guidelines: Operational Guide for QA/QP

How to Apply the ICH E Guidelines: Operational Guide for QA/QP

Introduction

The ICH E Guidelines define the global requirements to ensure quality in clinical studies. For QA and QP professionals, their value is not only regulatory but highly operational: supervision, documentation management, data integrity and risk-based oversight are essential for GCP compliance.
This step-by-step guide translates the regulatory requirements into concrete, actionable activities.


Step 1: Assess the Sponsor’s QMS

QA and QP must first verify that the Quality Management System is:

  • aligned with ICH E6(R3) principles,
  • risk-based (QbD + QRM),
  • supported by updated SOPs,
  • backed by monitoring plans consistent with study complexity.

The sponsor must clearly define roles, delegations and decision-making processes. If not, the risk of a Major finding is high.


Step 2: Verify Delegations and CRO Oversight

Any activity outsourced to a CRO or vendor must be:

  • formally defined in contracts,
  • properly documented within the TMF,
  • supervised through co-monitoring, review reports, KPIs and QTL.

Real case studies demonstrate that lack of oversight evidence leads to immediate critical deviations.


Step 3: Check the Investigator and Delegations

QA/QP must ensure that the site has:

  • a qualified investigator (CV, GCP training),
  • an updated delegation log proportional to task criticality,
  • clear processes for SAE and SUSAR reporting,
  • compliant IMP management and complete accountability.

ICH E Guidelines emphasise that no delegation removes the principal investigator’s ultimate responsibility.


Step 4: Ensure an Audit-Ready TMF

Checklist:

  • complete, version-controlled and accessible documents
  • Essential Records updated in real time
  • oversight evidence included
  • alignment between sponsor TMF and ISF
  • audit trails and electronic records incorporated

An incomplete TMF is one of the most frequently cited findings during EMA/MHRA inspections.


Step 5: Implement Risk-Based Quality Management

The guideline outlines the phases of QRM:

  • risk identification
  • assessment (probability, impact, detectability)
  • mitigation
  • monitoring
  • periodic review

Useful tools for QA/QP:

  • Quality Tolerance Limits (QTL)
  • central monitoring
  • trigger points for site escalation

Step 6: Manage Data Integrity

Critical controls include:

  • planned, risk-based audit trail review
  • user and privilege management
  • validation of systems (EDC, ePRO, eTMF, IRT)
  • checks on data transfers between systems
  • protection of the study blind

Common errors:

  • shared accounts
  • unreviewed audit trails
  • unvalidated systems
  • late unverified changes to critical data

How to Handle a Non-Conformity

When a deviation emerges:

  • document immediately
  • perform root cause analysis
  • assess impact on patient safety and data integrity
  • implement measurable CAPA
  • update SOPs or training when necessary

GMP Best Practices for QA/QP

  • Maintain an inspection mindset: TMF always ready
  • Synchronise protocol amendments with electronic systems
  • Regularly review RSI and safety processes
  • Ensure relevant audit trails are stored in the TMF
  • Request targeted training on QRM and data governance

Real Scenario

A sponsor receives a Major finding: incomplete TMF and undocumented CRO oversight.
QA/QP intervention:

  • reconstruction of missing documentation
  • implementation of quality KPIs
  • review of contracts and delegation definitions
  • update of the Monitoring Plan

Result: the study returns to compliance within three months.


Conclusion

The ICH E Guidelines become powerful operational tools when applied correctly. Through a structured, risk-based approach, QA and QP can ensure clinical studies that are robust, safe and fully audit-ready.
Discover the full guide on GuideGxP.com.

Back to blog

Looking for something specific?