Out of Tolerance (OOT) Management: A 6-Step Practical Guide

Out of Tolerance (OOT) Management: A 6-Step Operational Guide

The Calibration Manager's Nightmare

There is an acronym that every Calibration Manager, QA Manager and Qualified Person dreads hearing: OOT (Out of Tolerance) .

In the pharmaceutical world, calibration isn't a bureaucratic exercise. It's the guarantee that the number displayed on a screen (a temperature, a weight, a pH) corresponds to physical reality. When a technician, during periodic calibration, discovers that an instrument is "Out of Tolerance"—that is, incorrectly measuring beyond acceptable limits—a potential pitfall opens up.

The question that arises is terrifying: Which product batches were approved using falsified data?

Managing an OOT isn't just "fixing the device." It's a critical investigative process that impacts validation, compliance, and patient safety. Acting in a panicked manner, or worse, careless behavior, almost certainly leads to inspection findings (FDA Warning Letters or 483).

Here is a practical 6-step guide on how to manage an OOT event in a structured and GMP-compliant manner (ICH Q7, 21 CFR 211).


Step 1: Segregation and Identification (Immediate Action)

At the exact moment in which the technician (internal or external) detects the OOT "As Found" condition (in the state in which it is found, before any intervention):

  1. Stop Use: The instrument must be removed from service immediately.
  2. Labeling: Apply a clearly visible label: "OUT OF SERVICE – OOT" or "CALIBRATION FAILED – DO NOT USE." This prevents accidental use by Production or QC.
  3. Do Not Adjust the Instrument: It is essential not to adjust or repair the instrument immediately. The impact investigation (Step 3) must be performed on the instrument as is to determine the exact extent of the error.

Please note: If the third-party technician adjusts the instrument and only writes "As Left" compliant on the certificate, without reporting the "As Found" OOT data, they are committing a very serious violation (and the company accepting that certificate is complicit).

Step 2: Notification and Initiation of the Deviation (The Document Action)

OOT is a full-fledged GMP deviation.

  1. Immediate Notification: The Calibration Manager (or his representative) must immediately notify:
    • Quality Assurance (QA): For the formal opening of a Deviation/Investigation.
    • Department Manager (Production/QC): The user of the instrument.
    • Validation Manager: To evaluate the impact on the validation status of processes using that tool.
  2. Deviation Initiation: QA initiates the deviation management flow. The form must record:
    • Instrument ID and location.
    • Last valid calibration date.
    • OOT detection date.
    • "As Found" Data: What was the calibration point, what was the limit, what was the reading (the exact error).

Step 3: Impact Assessment (The Critical Inquiry)

This is the heart of OOT management and the part most closely monitored by inspectors. The goal is to answer the question: Has this OOT impacted product quality?

  1. Define the Risk Window: Identify the period in which the instrument provided unreliable data. The window should be:
    • FROM: Date of the last valid calibration (when it was definitely compliant).
    • AL: OOT calibration date.
  2. Identify Impacted Lots: Extract the list of all product lots (intermediate or finished) that have been produced, tested, or released using that tool into the risk window.
  3. Assess the Criticality (Risk Assessment):
    • Was the instrument critical? (e.g., API scale vs. room thermometer).
    • How much was OOT? (e.g. 0.1% on a scale vs. 10%).
    • In which direction? (e.g. a higher than actual OOT temperature in a stability study is much worse than a lower one).
    • Did the process have safety margins? (e.g., the process was validated to operate between 20°C and 30°C, and the OOT tool (error +2°C) still ensured that it remained within the actual 28°C? Perhaps the impact is zero.)

Caution: Never conclude "No impact" without objective evidence. "No impact" must be scientifically justified (e.g., "The +0.5°C error had no impact because the setpoint was 25°C and the process's maximum limit is 40°C").

Step 4: Corrective Actions on the Instrument

Only after completing the impact assessment (or collecting all the necessary "As Found" data) can the tool be implemented.

  1. Repair/Adjustment: You attempt to repair or adjust the instrument.
  2. "As Left" Calibration: A new complete post-intervention calibration is performed ("As Left").
  3. Outcome:
    • OK: The instrument is now compliant. It can be returned to service (with a new valid calibration label).
    • KO (Not repairable): The instrument must be scrapped and replaced.

Step 5: Corrective/Preventive Actions (CAPA)

The deviation investigation must include a root cause analysis of the OOT. Why did it happen?

  • Cause: Normal drift of the instrument (aging).
    • Preventive Action (PA): Reduce calibration frequency (e.g. from 12 to 6 months).
  • Cause: Improper use by operators (e.g. impacts, aggressive cleaning).
    • Corrective Action (CA): Retrain operators on instrument handling.
  • Cause: Instrument not suitable for the environment (e.g. too much humidity).
    • CA: Replace the instrument with a more robust model (IP65).
  • Cause: Previous calibration performed incorrectly.
    • CA: Qualify a new calibration provider.

Step 6: Closing the Diversion and Release

The final act is the formal closure of the deviation by QA, which must include:

  1. Survey summary.
  2. Final impact assessment (e.g. "Batches 1 to 10 not impacted, as per justification X", or "Batch 11 to be retested").
  3. Instrument status (e.g. "Repaired and Recalibrated", or "Replaced").
  4. CAPA approval and deadlines.

📦 GMP Best Practice: The "Risk-Based Approach" to Frequency

The best way to prevent OOTs is a risk-based calibration plan. Not all tools are created equal.

  • Critical Instruments (High Risk): API balances, temperature sensors in autoclaves/stability, pH probes for release. They have a direct impact on quality.
    • Action: High calibration frequency (e.g. 3-6 months) and intermediate checks (e.g. daily scale check with certified weight).
  • Non-Critical Instruments (Low Risk): Pressure gauges on auxiliary lines, room thermometers in non-critical areas.
    • Action: Lower frequency (e.g. 12-24 months).

Analyze calibration trends: If a critical instrument shows no drift for three years, an extension of the calibration interval can be scientifically justified. If an instrument (even a non-critical one) is out of calibration twice in a row, the interval should be reduced .


Operational Checklist for OOT Management

Use it to ensure you don't skip any steps during an emergency:

  • [ ] Immediate Action: Has the instrument been labeled "OUT OF ORDER"?
  • [ ] Immediate Action: Has use been prevented?
  • [ ] Documentation: Has a formal Deviation been opened in QA?
  • [ ] Notification: Have QA, Production/QC and Validation Managers been informed?
  • [ ] Survey (Data): Is "As Found" data available (exact error)?
  • [ ] Survey (Period): Has the risk window (from last OK calibration to today) been defined?
  • [ ] Survey (Lots): Is the list of impacted lots/activities available?
  • [ ] Investigation (Impact): Has the risk analysis on the batches been conducted and documented (scientific justification)?
  • [ ] Resolution: Was the instrument repaired/replaced?
  • [ ] Resolution: Is the compliant "As Left" certificate available?
  • [ ] CAPA: Has a Root Cause been identified?
  • [ CAPA: Have Preventive Actions been defined to avoid recurrence?
  • [ ] Closure: Has the deviation been formally closed by QA?

Conclusion

An OOT isn't a fault, it's data. It's how that data is managed that makes the difference between a company under control and one at risk.

Treating an Out-of-Tolerance (OOT) with the same seriousness as an Out-of-Spec (OOS) on the finished product is the approach required by inspectors and essential for patient safety. A structured, rigorously documented six-step process transforms a crisis (the OOT) into a demonstration of the robustness of the Quality System.

To learn more about integrating OOT management into your Validation Master Plan and creating audit-proof calibration procedures, check out the complete " Validation Manager and Calibration Manager Guide " on GuideGxP.com.

Back to blog
1 of 3

Looking for something specific?