Second edition · September 2026 · regulatory cut-off 23 September 2026
One harmonised format, five calendars: what in the ICH M series actually applies, where and from when.
In the European Union the dossier in five modules is law (Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC); the other M guidelines are scientific guidelines, to be followed or departed from with a justification. In the United States the CTD comes in through the eCTD door. And eCTD v4.0 is a single ICH specification with different regional calendars. This guide reads the M series from M1 to M18 text by text, with version, status and jurisdiction: 27 chapters in six parts, 261 pages in the English edition, 259 in the Italian, and 17 editable tools, for €129.
261 pages (ENG) · 259 (ITA) · A4 PDF27 chapters in six parts + 5 appendices17 editable tools: 10 Excel + 7 WordThe M series from M1 to M18eCTD v3.2.2 → v4.0195 sources in the register147 decisions tracked
Two separate editions: you choose the language. The guide and the toolkit exist as an Italian edition and as an English edition, identical in structure. Choose the ITA - Italiano or the ENG - English variant: the purchase gives access to the edition you choose.
The guide
27 chapters in six parts: the legal force of the M series, the CTD module by module under M4(R4), the eCTD from v3.2.2 to v4.0, the scientific guidelines (M3(R2), M7(R2), M9 to M15), the jurisdictions, readiness. Every chapter follows the same path — text → version and status → force in the jurisdiction → date → applicant's decision → document in which it is recorded → how it is demonstrated — and closes with the decisions it produces.
The toolkit
17 editable tools per edition: 10 Excel workbooks and 7 Word documents, each with an instructions section stating purpose, chapter of origin, who completes it and who approves it. The first is the M-series applicability matrix by jurisdiction: for every M text and every eCTD specification, label, date, legal force and source.
Lifetime updates
The framework moves, and some dates are already set: in the EU, eCTD v4.0 is strongly recommended from Q1 2027 and mandatory from Q1 2028 for new centralised MAAs only; M4Q(R2) is still a DRAFT, with Step 4 planned for June 2027; M13B, adopted in August 2026, comes into effect in the EU on 17/03/2027; the ICH Assembly in Prague (14–18/11/2026) may change the status of M4Q(R2) and of the topics in development. When the texts change you receive the revised guide and toolkit at no extra cost.
€129, and a snapshot dated 23 September 2026
This edition has been rewritten from scratch on the official sources as read on 23 September 2026. The first edition did not cover eCTD v4.0 and carried CTD section numbers that do not hold; this one has a register of 195 sources with URL and access date, and a status label on every document it cites.
The price is €129.00. Second edition, September 2026, version 2.0, with a regulatory verification cut-off of 23 September 2026: 261 pages in the English edition, 259 in the Italian, 27 chapters, 5 appendices and 17 editable tools. Buyers of the first edition receive this one at no extra cost.
The 17 tools in the toolkit
Ten Excel and seven Word, 17 files per edition. No operational value is preloaded. Internal publishing timelines, number of reviewers, gap assessment thresholds and weightings, leaf title and file name lengths, surveillance frequencies: they are “to be defined” placeholders, because no official source sets them for the applicant. Regulatory dates and statuses go in only with their source alongside. Example rows concern Arvena Pharma, a fictitious company, and are marked EXAMPLE.
EXCEL01 · M-series applicability matrix by jurisdiction
What applies, where, from when and with what force. For every M text and every eCTD specification, each jurisdiction's cell already carries label, date, legal force and source; the verification log keeps the date of the last check row by row.
EXCEL02 · CTD map and completeness checklist, Modules 1–5
Every applicable section has its document, and every “not applicable” section has its justification. Status by section and completeness of the dossier; non-EU Module 1 is left to be completed for the region concerned.
EXCEL03 · eCTD v4.0 Transition Readiness Assessment
Readiness for v4.0 by application, region and application type, with the correct regional reference for each: a date published by the authority, or “ICH table only”. No weighted score: dashboard and action plan.
EXCEL04 · Sequence and lifecycle register
Sequences submitted, lifecycle operations (v3.2.2) or context of use (v4.0), and the current status of every document. It is the register that answers “which document is current in this section?”.
EXCEL05 · Leaf title and granularity checker
Company rules for leaf titles, file names and granularity, with the outcome rule by rule. Lengths, characters and patterns are not prefilled: the company decides them and the sheet asks for them in writing.
EXCEL06 · Cross-module consistency register of the dossier
The same key data point must carry the same value in the QOS, in Module 3, in the overviews and in actual practice. The register checks it against the source record and tracks discrepancies and actions.
EXCEL07 · M4Q(R2) Impact Assessment [DRAFT]
M4Q(R2) readiness without anticipating obligations: a justified impact, product by product, on the ICH mapping, and an event-driven roadmap with windows relative to Step 4. It never carries the requirement label and is redone when the text becomes final.
EXCEL08 · Bioequivalence pathway selector (M9/M13A/M13B/EMA 1401)
Jurisdiction, dosage form, question, BCS class, NTI: the selector tells you which text governs the bioequivalence question, with label and source. It is built on one precise fact: M13A does not replace the EMA bioequivalence guideline.
EXCEL09 · Agency questions and commitments tracker
Questions received and commitments made, through to closure, with status and dashboard. No real questions preloaded; the ageing thresholds are set by the company.
EXCEL10 · Dossier gap assessment with dashboard
The dossier against requirements and guidelines, with the nature of every row (requirement, guidance, good practice) and the assessment. Gaps, CAPA and justified deviations stay separate; no draft text enters the requirements.
WORD11 · SOP for the preparation, publishing and QC of eCTD submissions
The sequence cycle from planning to archiving, with the QC checklist. Internal timelines, reviewers and frequencies are fields to be defined. Variation procedures are out of scope: they belong to the Regulatory Affairs guide.
WORD12 · SOP for core dossier governance and document lifecycle
A single dossier truth over time: core dossier, version control, link to change control, realignment of the dossier with actual practice. No classification of variations.
WORD13 · Quality Overall Summary template under M4Q(R1) with guidance
The QOS as a summary of Module 3, section by section under M4Q(R1), with completion guidance and a worked example on the fictitious product ARV-050. Stability appears only as a location in the CTD.
WORD14 · Nonclinical and Clinical Overview template under M4S/M4E with guidance
Overviews traceable to the study reports, under M4S(R2) and M4E(R2). No invented lengths: only those the sources state.
WORD15 · eCTD v4.0 transition plan
The readiness from tool 03 turned into a plan: scope as portfolio × region × application type, event-driven milestones and replanning triggers. Deadlines only where an authority has published them.
WORD16 · Regulatory intelligence procedure for the M series
How the official sources are monitored — ICH, EMA, FDA, PMDA, Health Canada, Swissmedic, MHRA — and how an event becomes an impact assessment. Official sources only; the frequency is the company's decision.
WORD17 · Pre-submission dossier review kit
A mock review of the frozen dossier before submission: questions anchored to the text, expected evidence, red flags, minutes and sign-off. No invented deficiency statistics.
You can use it from tomorrow morning
| The situation | What you use |
|---|
| We have to decide whether the next centralised MAA goes out in eCTD v4.0 | Chapters 11, 12 and 26 + Tools 03 and 15: in the EU, v4.0 is optional from 22/12/2025 for new centralised MAAs only, strongly recommended from Q1 2027, mandatory from Q1 2028 for new CAP MAAs only. The Chapter 12 decision tree answers v3.2.2 or v4.0 for the next submission |
| The project plan says “FDA: eCTD v4.0 mandatory from 2029” | Chapter 12 + Tool 01: FDA has accepted v4.0 since 16/09/2024 for new NDAs, BLAs, ANDAs, INDs and master files, but has not published a mandatory date; 2029 appears only in the ICH regional implementation table (August 2026) |
| We also file in Japan | Chapters 12 and 24: for new applications filed from April 2026, PMDA accepts eCTD v4.0 only (PMDA slides of 28/11/2025, “planned”); no later PMDA notice confirming it could be found |
| The QOS and Module 3 do not say the same thing | Chapters 7, 8 and 14 + Tools 06 and 13: the cross-module consistency register and the QOS template under M4Q(R1), which normally should not exceed 40 pages of text excluding tables and figures (80 for biotech products and complex processes) |
| We are asked how we are preparing for M4Q(R2) | Chapter 10 + Tool 07: M4Q(R2) is a DRAFT (Step 2, 14 May 2025; Step 4 planned for June 2027); in the EU and the US, M4Q(R1) applies. Readiness in weeks relative to Step 4, not early compliance |
| Our bioequivalence study cites M13A and nothing else | Chapter 16 + Tool 08: M13A supersedes only the applicable parts of the EMA bioequivalence guideline (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev. 1), which otherwise remains in force; its Appendix III had already been superseded by M9 from 30/07/2020 |
Our SOPs cite CPMP/ICH/2887/99 as if that were enough | Chapter 1 + Tool 16: the same code is shared by M4, M4Q, M4S and M4E. The fixed-field citation line — title, code, Step, effective date, status, verification date — still holds when the status changes |
| The submission goes out in two weeks | Chapters 25 and 27 + Tools 17 and 09: five families of deficiencies, each anchored to a text, four case studies and 25 questions an agency may ask, with expected evidence and red flags |
Why a date in the ICH table is not a deadline
One ICH specification, five calendars. ICH Step 4 for eCTD v4.0 dates from 10/12/2015 and creates no obligation: each region sets its own. In the EU, v4.0 is optional from 22/12/2025 for new centralised MAAs only, strongly recommended from Q1 2027, and mandatory from Q1 2028 for new CAP MAAs only; for MRP, DCP and national procedures EMA has published no date, and v3.2.2 continues to be accepted. In the US, FDA has accepted v4.0 since 16/09/2024 and has not published a mandatory date: 2029 appears only in the ICH regional implementation table. In Japan, new applications from April 2026 are v4.0 only according to the PMDA slides, which say “planned”. EMA has not fixed the exact day within Q1 2027 or Q1 2028, and the guide does not calculate one.
The CTD is law in the EU; the rest of the M series is guidance, with a precise burden. Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC, as introduced by Directive 2003/63/EC, requires the dossier in five modules for every type of marketing authorisation application, irrespective of the procedure. Scientific guidelines have no legal force, but any deviation has to be fully justified in the application at the time of submission. In the US the CTD comes in through the eCTD door: the obligation stems from section 745A(a) of the FD&C Act, with the dates of 05/05/2017 and 05/05/2018.
Step 4 is not entry into force. M15 reached Step 4 on 29/01/2026 and applies in the EU from 23/07/2026; M13A reached Step 4 on 23/07/2024, applies in the EU from 25/01/2025 and was implemented in Canada on 27/12/2025. In 2026 three M guidelines became applicable in the EU: M14 from 18/03/2026, M11 from 11/06/2026, M15 from 23/07/2026. And M13A does not replace the EMA bioequivalence guideline: it supersedes only its applicable parts.
No date, code or figure without a source. Nine labels in two families state, at every citation, the status of the document (current, not yet applicable with its date, draft, in development, superseded) and the nature of the statement (requirement, guidance, good practice, GuideGxP editorial work). Verification cut-off 23 September 2026, a register of 195 sources with URL and access date, 147 decisions tracked with who decides and where it is recorded. No statistics on dossier deficiencies: none of the official sources read publishes any, and the guide says so.
Inside the guide
Part I — The M series and its legal force (Chapters 1–4). How to read the guide, with the nine labels and five reading paths by function; the M-series calendar from 2000 to 2030; the ICH Steps and the jurisdiction rule; the inventory from M1 to M18, with the status of each text and what does not exist (M5 stopped at Step 2, there is no M17).
Part II — The CTD (Chapters 5–10). M4(R4), the organisation of the CTD and granularity; the regional Module 1 compared across the EU, the US, Japan, Canada and the UK, for format only; Module 2 with the QOS, overviews and summaries; Module 3 under M4Q(R1); Modules 4 and 5 with section numbers checked against the guidelines; M4Q(R2) as readiness, not compliance.
Part III — The eCTD (Chapters 11–14). From v3.2.2 to v4.0, with the technical differences read only from ICH and FDA sources; the five regional calendars and the decision tree for the next submission; publishing in practice: leaf titles, lifecycle, sequence planning, technical validation and QC; dossier governance, from the core dossier to cross-module consistency.
Part IV — The scientific guidelines (Chapters 15–21). M3(R2) and the timing of clinical development; the M9, M13A, M13B and M13C bioequivalence cluster, with a decision tree on which text governs; M10 for bioanalytical method validation; M12 for drug interactions; M7(R2) in brief and M14; M11 and M15; the topics in development — M16, M18, the M7 nitrosamine addendum — and how to monitor them.
Part V — The jurisdictions (Chapters 22–24). The European Union and the United Kingdom; the United States; Japan, Canada, Switzerland, Brazil and China, with the verified implementing instrument, the gaps declared where verification was not possible, and the comparative table.
Part VI — Readiness and verification (Chapters 25–27). Recurring dossier deficiencies in five families, each anchored to a text; the dossier gap assessment and the eCTD v4.0 transition plan with event-driven milestones; four case studies in the format problem → risk → decision → activities → documentation → evidence → outcome, and 25 questions an agency may ask, with expected evidence and red flags.
Plus 5 appendices. The register of 195 sources with URL and access date; the status matrix by jurisdiction; the 147 decisions, each with who decides, on what basis and where it is recorded; the cards for the 17 tools; the glossary.
Read the extract before you buy
The free extract is made of real pages from the book, not a sales summary: 20 pages in the English edition, 19 in the Italian. It contains the regulatory status box with the dates to note, the full table of contents with the real page numbers, the five eCTD calendars table from Chapter 12, a complete case study from Chapter 27 — the same method change handled in eCTD v3.2.2 in the EU and in v4.0 in the US — and the list of the 17 tools.
Specifications
| Format | A4 PDF — 259 pages (ITA edition) · 261 pages (ENG edition) |
| Edition | Second edition · September 2026 · version 2.0. Rewritten from scratch; supersedes the first edition. |
| Structure | 27 chapters in six parts + 5 appendices |
| Scope | The ICH M series from M1 to M18: the CTD (M4), eCTD v3.2.2 and v4.0 (M8, M2), the scientific guidelines (M3, M7, M9 to M15), the topics in development. The dossier: content, format, eCTD and technical lifecycle. |
| Out of scope | Authorisation procedures, variations, renewals and dealings with the authorities (GuideGxP Regulatory Affairs guide); stability and the content of Q8–Q14 (ICH Q guide); mutagenic impurities and nitrosamines (Q3D + M7 guide). |
| Jurisdictions covered | European Union, United Kingdom, United States, Japan, Canada, Switzerland, Brazil and China |
| Toolkit | 17 editable tools per edition: 10 Excel workbooks and 7 Word documents |
| Languages | The guide and the toolkit exist as an Italian edition and as an English edition, identical in structure: choose the ITA - Italiano or the ENG - English variant. |
| Sources | Register of 195 official sources, with issuing body, title, code, version, status, URL and access date |
| Decisions | 147 decisions tracked: what is decided, who decides, on what basis, where it is recorded |
| Regulatory cut-off | 23 September 2026 |
| Free preview | 19 pages (ITA edition) · 20 pages (ENG edition) |
| Price | €129.00 |
| Delivery and licence | Immediate download after purchase. Individual use, internal to the purchasing company. Digital product: no physical shipment. |
Who it is for. Regulatory Affairs and Regulatory Operations, eCTD publishing, Regulatory Intelligence, CMC and Module 3 authors, nonclinical and clinical authors, clinical pharmacology and generics development, QA reviewing the dossier before submission, consultants. It is written for people who prepare, publish or review a dossier and need to know which text governs a section, in which version, with what force and from when: it does not explain what a medicinal product or a marketing authorisation application is.
Who it is not for. It is not the Regulatory Affairs guide: EU authorisation procedures (centralised, MRP, DCP, national), the variations regulation, renewals, the sunset clause and assessment timelines are out of scope. It is not the ICH Q guide, nor the Q3D + M7 guide. It does not reproduce the text of the guidelines, which you should keep at hand. And it is not legal advice: its readings of legal force are interpretations based on the sources cited, not opinions.
Do you have to decide whether and when to move to eCTD v4.0, or defend a dossier choice in front of an agency?
Describe your portfolio, the regions you file in and the point where you are stuck. GuideGxP will assess the request and, where appropriate, may put you in touch with a specialist matched to your technical needs and your geographical area.
Describe your situation →
No obligation to buy. Every request is assessed before any referral to a specialist.
GuideGxP guides do not replace the official regulations (ICH, European Commission, EMA, FDA, MHLW/PMDA, Health Canada, Swissmedic, MHRA, Anvisa, NMPA): they are operational support tools, and the user remains responsible for the correct application of the regulations in force in their own company context. The official texts of the ICH M guidelines and of the eCTD specifications are freely available and should be kept at hand while reading: this guide does not replace them. The regulatory status described is the one verified on 23/09/2026: applicability dates, the status of draft documents — M4Q(R2) in particular — and the version of the eCTD v4.0 Implementation Guide accepted by each authority must be rechecked before use. ICH guidelines have no legal force in themselves: binding force comes from regional implementation, which this guide states jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Digital product: no physical shipment.